Beer Chang Posted February 2, 2010 Report Posted February 2, 2010 Brilliant move by ManCrunch getting lots of free publicity from getting their ad rejected. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MQWFiIrBLA&feature=player_embedded
Wino Posted February 10, 2010 Report Posted February 10, 2010 ManCrunch? Although I have never heard of the company, I would be surprised if they had $3 million for a 30 second ad.
Beer Chang Posted February 10, 2010 Author Report Posted February 10, 2010 I doubt it too. But they got lots of publicity for free.
Wino Posted February 10, 2010 Report Posted February 10, 2010 And that is what they are after. Was it Madonna that said an publicity is good?
lvdkeyes Posted February 11, 2010 Report Posted February 11, 2010 I wouldn't put much stock in what Madonna has to say. There is bad publicity - just ask Tiger Woods.
Beer Chang Posted February 11, 2010 Author Report Posted February 11, 2010 But the ManCrunch episode was not bad publicity. It was free publicity.
MidTMike Posted February 15, 2010 Report Posted February 15, 2010 I saw the ad and thought amateurish. Why would the network allow such an ad? It made no sense to me.
Beer Chang Posted February 15, 2010 Author Report Posted February 15, 2010 Here's the ad: <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value=" name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src=" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
Beer Chang Posted February 15, 2010 Author Report Posted February 15, 2010 Looks like forum software does not permit embedding. Here's a link: http://www.youtube.c...h?v=0VMqHb03p74
Recommended Posts